A Stefan Klopp Weblog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Verizon 450 Requested mail action not taken-Try later

Are you running a website or a server in which you are having trouble sending emails to verizon.net email accounts? Are you getting errors when trying to send emails, or messages in your log files such as:

450 Requested mail action not taken-Try later

Well for the longest time I couldn’t figure out why I couldn’t send to verizon.net customers, I read all the forums that talked about it (do a google search there are plenty) and yet still couldn’t figure out why our sites couldn’t send to Verizon. I decided to give up on the issue as I was going around in circles trying to figure out what the problem was.

Lately I decided this issue needed to be solved and that I would get to the bottom of things once and for all. I went back and started scouring all the message boards and forums regarding this issue until finally coming to this discussion: http://www.issociate.de/board/post/129726/Timeout_question.html

After reading what the users were saying in this post I was able to figure out what the problem was.

Verizon to fight against spam checks the senders email address once it gets sent to it via a MAIL FROM: . It will connect to the mail server of that domain and check to see if that user exists. If the user exists it will allow the user to send mail to a verizon client, if not it will give you this error.

So how do you fix this problem? Well first check in your logs what email address is trying to send emails to verizon.net. This will usually be denoted by a “from: ” in your log files. Next you will need to make sure that the domain trying to send the email has an MX record setup for it to point to the mail server that handles that domain. Lastly (very important) make sure that you can connect to the mail server from the internet. The reason my mail was never being sent out to my clients was mainly because we blocked incomming smtp connections, which meant that verizon could never verify if the user sending the email actually existed.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post

21 comments

1 Paul C. { 06.27.05 at 10:24 am }

Thanks for the summary blog post. Saved me some reading. This is rediculous for someone to utilize this method. For instance, for our company, we have the MX records pointing to a mailgateway that scans email for viruses and spam and then forwards on to the mail server. The servers do not host accounts for the domains, they only act as a relay (not open). Verizon sucks.

2 stefan { 06.27.05 at 5:16 pm }

Yeah that dues suck Paul. One method you could do to get around this (however roundabout it may be) is to point your mail to your mail server, have it then relay all mail to your spam server, then have the spam server send the mail back to your mail server to a second MTA running on a different port. Not the best of solutions but could likely work.

3 Paul C. { 06.28.05 at 9:09 am }

Do you know which number you dialed to speak to someone? I’ve tried 877-375-2604, 1-866-424-6834, 813-978-4000, and a couple others listed on their website. Thanks.

4 stefan { 06.29.05 at 6:37 pm }

I actually never spoke with anyone at Verizon; like you I could never find their #. I just did it all by trial and error until I found out why they were blocking the emails…

5 Thomas { 08.26.05 at 8:15 pm }

So, in an effort to fight spam, they want calling MTAs to be configured in a way that will make the calling MTA a better target for receiving spams? Is that what I’m getting from this???

Not terribly suprising. Verizon’s Email people were a bunch of idiots when I worked for their web development group (back when they were still Bell Atlantic Internet Services). Nice to see that some things never change. :(

-tom

6 UUC Admin { 08.31.05 at 11:46 am }

I’m just sending out the “sorry your ISP sucks” email to all the verizon people and removing them from my mailing lists. I’m not jumping through hoops for these idiot ISP’s anymore.

7 Paul C. { 09.06.05 at 12:44 pm }

I thought I woudl post a follow up on this. As an ISP, you can submit a request on Verizon’s website to have them review your situation and add you to the white list here:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/whitelist/request_form.asp?id=isp
Here is their help item page about this matter:
http://netservices.verizon.net/portal/site/msa/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=c567d167631f692124525d7253295c48&nv=F&case=21062

I submitted the form for our company and gave our customer the “member” page so they can submit a request as well. Knock on wood, lets hope it works.

8 Web Spinners, LLC { 09.10.05 at 9:56 pm }

Hi All!
I had the same problem and it was driving me nuts! No web orders for the hundreds of domains we host would make it through and no autoforwarders would work to verizon.net mailboxes for any of our clients domains! Then after reading a url noted above i realized they might be on the DBL i use or their smtp test maybe did not have a PTR or MX which my mailserver requires. Nope and nope. My mailserver (Merak) was set to delay smtp connections for 30 seconds to slow down spam and DoS attacks. I changed this to 5 seconds to be under the 15 seconds i read verizon waits for a response and like magic my outgoing que to verizon cleared out!
Make sure your smtp connections are not paused more than 10 or 15 seconds and you should be ok.

I hope this helps!

Michael Davis
Web Spinners, LLC
http://www.webspinners.net

9 Elmo { 10.28.05 at 2:27 pm }

I entered an SPF record in my zone file, and everything worked okay with verizon. Use the wizzard here: http://spf.pobox.com/ to generate an IN TXT file for your zone. If you have an spf record, verizon would let your email through.

10 JMS { 12.02.05 at 1:27 pm }

We were having similiar problems.

It turns out that Verizon opens a channel back to the sending server as it begins to receive a message.

In our case, we had an anti-spam filter checking all inbound messages against a SLS resource. Checking all of the lists we do, took over 20 seconds. Too long for Verizon.

Verizon did not see a response within it’s 2 second window, so it gave up, and rejected our outbound message to it in turn.

11 Jon { 05.21.06 at 5:51 am }

What’s really anoying is that the error response from verizon’s mailer doesn’t give one a clue about the problem. I might not like their system, but I can at least try to deal with it if I understand what is happening.

12 Matt S. { 06.27.06 at 4:00 pm }

THANK YOU for taking the time to post –OP and all you other folks too. I feel like I have a fighting chance at getting mail from my server through to Verizon now.

13 Matt S. { 07.18.06 at 9:57 pm }

Followup: I added an SPF record to my zone file and Verizon is still rejecting my mail. Hmm.

14 Tom F { 09.01.06 at 6:57 am }

Hi all, I use Merak Mail and had this same issue. I found that my smtp delay was at 10, and was still too long for Verizon. I dropped down to 3 and that seems to help. I also bypassed verizon.net in the ‘Deny SMTP VRFY’ bypass file. Now I see what looks like greylisting errors, instead of the endless 450 errors. And the mail eventually looks like it goes. Hope it helps you.

15 Marc R { 09.26.06 at 8:44 am }

In the case of my client it took 50 seconds to respond when I telnetted to their Domino server. I then found they had 10 blacklists defined. I took them down to 4 blacklists and there is only a 15 second delay now. They are now able to send to Verizon.

16 Kelly { 11.28.06 at 11:24 am }

Thanks Web Spinners. I have Merak it this fixed my problem

17 GeekZero { 03.05.07 at 3:15 pm }

Here’s an interesting kettle o’ fish. Based on the discussion here I tweaked my DNS servers and added some more SPF records, but Verizon was still cranky. Then I checked my SMTP logs, and found that the server they’re using to check whether they are receiving spam, it itself listed as a spam source! Therefore my server rejects their test (since they are blacklisted as a spammer) and they in turn fail and refuse to take my legitimate mail. Here’s the message in my log:

Sorry 206.46.252.164 is Level 1 listed at UCEPROTECT-NETWORK. See http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=206.46.252.164

Looking there, it appears the /24 block is blacklisted due to spamtraps catching them.

So they won’t allow my legitimate mail through because they are spammers. Yikes.

I’m going to try removing uceprotect from my list of sources to check for spam and see if it goes through.

18 GeekZero { 03.05.07 at 3:25 pm }

Yep that worked – I removed uceprotect from my RBL list and now Verizon mail delivers. But to work around their spam solution, I have to expose myself to more spammers.

19 Bob { 03.08.07 at 7:08 am }

Smith College has recently been experiencing the same issue with non delivery to verizon.net

Trying to get a meaningful dialog going with Verizon was an exercise in futility. All the support centers I spoke to ended with something along the lines of ‘We cannot help with that issue and we do not have the contact information you require.’

Prompted by Geekzero’s post I checked our McAfee appliance logs more thoroughly and found the following:

… Event=’Reputation Service triggered’, status=’Connection closed’, source=sv3pub.verizon.net(206.46.252.139) …

The appliance uses the Postini IP reputation service to block known spammer sources.

Now I have to figure a way of trusting Verizons servers enough to allow them to authenticate senders without opening the flood gates to all their spam.

I so want to just block all verizon traffic…

20 Bob { 03.08.07 at 8:05 am }

According to McAfee:

……..
When sending email to Verizon.net addresses they attempt to validate that the Sender E-mail Address (Mail From:) is a valid mailbox before accepting the e-mail. Due to several factors the Verizon.net SMTP servers have been placed in the Reputation Database so the connections are denied. When the connection is denied the Verizon server then denies the incoming connection with SMTP Error 450 Try Again Later.
……..

Their solution is to add the addresses for the server block that performs the sender checks to the permitted sender list. They say:

……..
In order to resolve this issue you will also need to ensure that your McAfee Appliance is not blocking connections from 206.46.252.137 – 206.46.252.164. These IP addresses are used solely for the above explained process and deliver no email.
……..

I have done this and connections from those servers are now no longer being rejected and mail is being delivered to verizon.net recipients.

You watch now as they decide to change the addresses on all those servers…

21 Web Spinners, LLC { 05.11.07 at 5:56 pm }

See my earlier post above about the delay. If your response to their checkback test of the email address takes longer than 15 seconds Verizon will deny your email. Too many filters will do this. It is good advice to bypass their IP range from filters and greylisting to ensure you respond “that is a valid email address…go ahead” to which they will just drop connection and accept your email then.
-Mike

Leave a Comment